Abstract:

Limited medical image data hinders the training of deep learning (DL) models in the biomedical field. Image augmentation can reduce the data-scarcity problem by generating variations of existing images. However, currently implemented methods require coding, excluding non-programmer users from this opportunity.We therefore present ImageAugmenter, an easy-to-use and open-source module for 3D Slicer imaging computing platform. It offers a simple and intuitive interface for applying over 20 simultaneous MONAI Transforms (spatial, intensity, etc.) to medical image datasets, all without programming.ImageAugmenter makes accessible medical image augmentation, enabling a wider range of users to improve the performance of DL models in medical image analysis by increasing the number of samples available for training.

Abstract:

In recent years, synthetic Computed Tomography (CT) images generated from Magnetic Resonance (MR) or Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) acquisitions have been shown to be comparable to real CT images in terms of dose computation for radiotherapy simulation. However, until now, there has been no independent strategy to assess the quality of each synthetic image in the absence of ground truth. In this work, we propose a Deep Learning (DL)-based framework to predict the accuracy of synthetic CT in terms of Mean Absolute Error (MAE) without the need for a ground truth (GT). The proposed algorithm generates a volumetric map as an output, informing clinicians of the predicted MAE slice-by-slice. A cascading multi-model architecture was used to deal with the complexity of the MAE prediction task. The workflow was trained and tested on two cohorts of head and neck cancer patients with different imaging modalities: 27 MR scans and 33 CBCT. The algorithm evaluation revealed an accurate HU prediction (a median absolute prediction deviation equal to 4 HU for CBCT-based synthetic CTs and 6 HU for MR-based synthetic CTs), with discrepancies that do not affect the clinical decisions made on the basis of the proposed estimation. The workflow exhibited no systematic error in MAE prediction. This work represents a proof of concept about the feasibility of synthetic CT evaluation in daily clinical practice, and it paves the way for future patient-specific quality assessment strategies.